The U.S. Supreme Court’s emergency docket often referred to as the “shadow docket” is under growing criticism as it handles a wave of high-profile cases without full hearings or public transparency.
Cases currently under emergency review include new abortion restrictions in Georgia, surveillance expansion requests, and emergency injunctions on mail-in voting laws in Arizona.
Legal experts argue that the docket is increasingly being used to make major decisions without oral arguments or formal opinions. A group of lawmakers is preparing to introduce a bill requiring disclosure of vote counts and reasoning in all emergency rulings.
Also Read: “Elon Musk Accused of Covering Up Neuralink Side Effects in Human Trials”
Follow us on X @Dobblog1
No comments:
Post a Comment
Join the conversation by leaving a comment below. Keep it respectful, relevant, and on-topic - we love hearing from our readers!